Celebrity and the rise of pseudo-science

Currently in-vogue Power Balance bracelet

In many increasingly secular Western countries, faith in religion seems to be losing ground to faith in science.  Although in itself worrying for some, I think both would find much more problematic the rise in the last decade of faith in celebrity.  Taking these stars of the sports field, airwaves and silver screen as our aspirational role models for all we wish to do and be, it seems impossible not to listen and take to heart what they say.  It’s just a shame it equally seems impossible to be in the public eye and not endorse a position a considerable distance from the mainstream.  The celebrity converts to scientology and other ‘unconventional’ religions are already well documented, and now, as we move into 2011, Sense About Science (SAS) have released their annual list of dubious endorsements made by the stars in the world of science.

Mocking Cheryl Cole’s ‘blood-group specific’ diet regime, Sarah Harding’s practice of sprinkling charcoal dust on her food, David Beckham’s Power Balance bracelet or Alex Reid’s ‘sperm-reabsorption’ before a fight may raise a smile for those of a more scientific mien, but with the extensive media coverage each of these would have received, the dissemination (no pun intended) of such ideas will have already occurred.  And as Ben Goldacre proved with his book ‘Bad Science’, there will always be a scientist on hand to back up the most esoteric of claims, so even when trying to debunk such ‘myths’, to the public it will often just appear as a playground fight between two opposing teams.  The unwashed masses have always looked to others for guidance, be it from religious leaders or men of science; unfortunately, those doing most of the guiding as 2010 comes to a close seem to be those most in need of guidance themselves.

Related Articles:

Science and Religion: Philosophical Issues

Alan G. Padgett

Debunking Arguments and the Genealogy of Religion and Morality

Kelby Mason

3 thoughts on “Celebrity and the rise of pseudo-science”

    1. Hmm, good question – it was much easier to critically assess than to give anything constructive! I guess the fundamental problem is an innate desire to BE led, regardless of who/what is doing the leading…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: